字典的錯與便宜的歌

早前在文稿中寫了這句：
He hopes to find a job on the local newspaper.

同事甲看見，替栗改為：
He hopes to find a job at a local newspaper.

栗當然不服氣，於是翻字典，見到這句：
She hopes to get a job on the local newspaper and eventually work for 'The Time'.

我不過將 get a job 改為 find a job，不會影響到句子後半段吧？莫非字典有錯？

~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~

提到字典會否出錯，栗想起之前跟友人爭論 for good 的意思時，他說牛津舊版字典有 finally 一解。不過我查最新版的牛津字典時，只餘下 permanently (永久) 一項。到底是字典出錯，還是 finally 這項，被時間洪流沖掉？

~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~ ＊ ~

早幾天忽然想起 for a song (非常便宜)，上網一查，終於知道其典故：
This idiom alludes to the pennies given to street singers or to the small cost of sheet music. [Late 1500s] (Source: www.answers.com)

想當年，栗因為誤譯這句成語，功課給扣了分呢~~~