之前看新聞報導，說今年會考英文科卷一(閱讀) 出了亂子，但詳情則欠奉。要到最近，栗子妹才弄清楚發生了甚麼事。
事源卷一有兩個本子，一本是閱讀篇章，另一本是答題簿。今年的閱讀篇章，一開始便是Part 2，這令部分考生懷疑是否試卷漏印。
不過，只要細看試題，便知道是考生糊塗。因為答題簿第一部分的指示，根本沒說要看篇章作答，那當然是沒有第一部分的篇章！須知閱讀篇章只屬附件，未必會從一開始。
這件事讓栗子妹想起，其實除了學生以外，很多成年人都不喜閱讀指示。先別說亂過馬路的大小朋友，看看在地鐵車廂內進食的人群，還有在博物館內隨意拍照的「雅士」，便知道這個社會愛率性而為的人何其多。
不知是否廠商深諳人性，所以在寫說明書時，偶爾會敷衍了事，皆因知道沒人會看！唉，普通產品的說明書還可，如果是危險品的說明書，那便大件事了~~~
考生糊塗 ??
回覆刪除Ok, let me get this straight. The paper starts with the directions, then Part 2. The students get confused. You still call this a case of 考生糊塗 ?
Where I came from, Part 1 usually follows the directions, then onward to part 2, regardless of whether there's a passage to be read, or not. No?
[版主回覆05/25/2009 12:46:00]Teacher: Somehow I can't pity the students . As the Reading Passages booklet is only a kind of attachment, they should read the instructions in the Question-Answer booklet first and carefully .
But of course, I don't think it's a good idea to include a grammar usage section in the Reading paper, even though that part is extremely easy.
" 先別說亂過馬路的大小朋友 ...": I think this is more than a " 不喜閱讀指示 " problem , it's also a risk assessment problem. It's a classic case of a "candy vs factory" gamble (huge risk, negligible gain), and it's a foolish move IMO.
回覆刪除栗妹說的倒是一個問題， 說明書怕很少人完完全全把它看完過吧
回覆刪除